An excellent, interesting book about the French origins of Fascism (with a little help from America)
The First Fascist: Marquis de Morés (amzn.to/3OVZjKA)
First they came for …
Relates to describing or analysing fascism as a political paradigm
An excellent, interesting book about the French origins of Fascism (with a little help from America)
The First Fascist: Marquis de Morés (amzn.to/3OVZjKA)
‘Fascism’ (the apostrophes are deliberate & signify not-a-real-thing) is so very dangerous for it rises not from the mind but the belly. It is not a thoughtful style of politics but a lurking crocodile waiting to snap at whatever passes. Born of the limbic brain as Koestler would have said.
No fascist ever produced great literature or reasoned theses; worse they never read them as a pastime. What is eerie is that the fascists of history were all so unenlightened, so wilfully ignorant yet somehow they are so alike and share common, limbic, attributes …
For reference: this idea, that the political geography of the fascist arises spontaneously, (as opposed to developed in some manner by thinking) was prompted by reading a very striking book: ‘The First Fascist’ by Sergio Luzzato. A ‘must read’ if you are interested in the history of hate. Note: apparently it first arises in France, (pace!), may have something to do with the disappointments of the 1789 revolution, but grows to become a widespread European phenomenon where those disappointments are acutely felt …
Example: what is particularly striking about Trump – who probably cannot read – is that he comes across as a ‘genetic’ descendent of these European monsters, an ignoramus who simply appears as though stamped out of a template …
From Jonathan Rauch, 25/1/26
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/01/america-fascism-trump-maga-ice/685751/
Rauch has reached a point where it is clear that fascism is at large in America. Not so long ago people might have pooh-poohed the idea. It was still avoidable, but not now – there is an ID parade and what the MAGA mob is doing matches the surveillance pictures.
Writing a year ago, I argued that Trump’s governing regime is a version of patrimonialism, in which the state is treated as the personal property and family business of the leader. That is still true. But, as I also noted then, patrimonialism is a style of governing, not a formal ideology or system. It can be layered atop all kinds of organizational structures, including not just national governments but also urban political machines such as Tammany Hall, criminal gangs such as the Mafia, and even religious cults. Because its only firm principle is personal loyalty to the boss, it has no specific agenda. Fascism, in contrast, is ideological, aggressive, and, at least in its early stages, revolutionary. It seeks to dominate politics, to crush resistance, and to rewrite the social contract.
He puts forward a list of 18 characteristics, a ‘constellation’ or features. Some or all might be present. He believes they are all present in the political life of the US (from the UK here it looks that way too).
For all of us the question is how many do you need to be living in a fascist state? In Amerika it seems clear that to some degree or other most if not all are present. In the UK we do not yet reach a threshold although the attempt by Labour to designate Palestine Action was one step on the road. Thankfully that has now been ruled unlawful by the High Court. The UK is dithering and although there are proto-fascists hanging around in the wings they do not yet have the kind of power that might be needed to ‘set things rolling’.
Here is his list. Fill in the blanks:
1. Demolition of norms
Trump: Mocking, insulting, demeaning etc.
“Fascists know that what the American Founders called the “republican virtues” impede their political agenda, and so they gleefully trash liberal pieties such as reason and reasonableness, civility and civic spirit, toleration and forbearance.
2. Glorification of violence
Violence is enabled, embraced, encouraged. Trump openly talks about physical violence, executions dissenters, facilitates mob violence (e.g. Jan 6 22; ICE)
3. Might is right
The humiliation of Zelenskyy, threats of military interventions etc.
4. Politicised law enforcement
ICE! Trump flouts his ‘absolute immuncity’ immunity and ignores all due process
5. Dehumanisation
Look at the ay Trump talks about immigrants; if he could get away with it he would talk in the same way about African American, Native Americans etc. (Perhaps he will!)
6. Police-state tactics
ICE!
7. Undermining elections
Currently attempting to ‘federalize’ elections procedures (even though States are constitutionally responsible managing elections in their own regions). Also, Trump will not shut up about the 2020 election.
8. What’s private is public
For example interfering in University education, demanding that DEI policies everywhere are deleted …
9. Attacks on news media
So many examples …
10. Territorial and military aggression
Venezuela, Canada, Greenland, Iran, Gaza (watch this space).
11. Transnational reach
Alliances with right wing governments, deference towards Puin
12. Blood-and-soil nationalism
Immigration and the revocation of birthright citizenship. ‘Heritage’ Americanism
13. White and Christian nationalism
Christianity!
14. Mobs and street thugs
ICE! Control over school libraries. Gun laws
15. Leader aggrandizement
Ballrooms; Kennedy Centre; third person self-referencing
16. Alternative facts
A hangover from 2016; the deletion of science as process and content; habitual lies and distortions.
17. Politics as war
Saving the nation, a ‘lie and death battle’ (Michael Anton); (the Volk)
18. Governing as revolution
See all of above … !
New additions (mostly mine)
19. Revisionism
This covers the entire attempt to ‘rewrite’ the broadly accepted history of the US and the rest of the world. Issues such as the removal of reference to slavery; the revival of deprecated Civil War combatants, The erasure of social-called DEI policies (i.e. ‘woke’)
Examples: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/18/constitution-museum-philadelphia-jeffrey-rosen
Well here we go… so many groups of dumb idiots spoiling for a fight. Frightening and sad for all of us. The tragedy is that Americans have little reason for this apart from the power of money and the media that it buys, stirring the cauldron of fear and hate. Intellectually speaking we need a new variation on Godwins Law because this is no longer a mere exchange of opinion but new tipping point where real blood is running … a trickle today but in a year’s time?
Oh yes, and there’s that terrific film now on TV: M: Son of the Century; it pretty much covers what is going on (though as I said we don’t want to raise the spectre of Godwin’s Law just yet. We have to spot the differences … though there aren’t really that many! Mussolini was clever in teh way that egotists can be, but also a devious liar, and later lying was burned into him. America today is the whipping dog of a shameless ignoramus, running wild with a pack of of brown noses …
Here is an example of American ‘Squadristi’ in action – aren’t they lovely specimens?
https://x.com/DavidJLongman/status/1892530009752879406
If Mussolini has a counterpart in the America past it is probably Al Capone; though he never had aspirations to run the country his schtick was the same …