Rescue mission!
Space War
Simple collection of links about the exploitation of near-earth Space
Tests are dead?
“…for educators, the technology opens the door to widespread cheating on homework and take-home assignments, and many have been scrambling to rethink the nature of assessment or otherwise discourage students using the tool.”
“… ChatGPT is capable of passing — or at least nearly passing — the US medical licensing exams, according to researchers in the US who put it to the test.”
Tesla vs. ‘Tesla’
The lives of Nicola Tesla (the real one) and ‘Tesla’ (the cosplay one) share a striking similarity. Tesla was very clever. His early inventions were decisive. He had an engineer’s fascination for how natural forces work but he had a prophet’s view of electrical energy. His later life was a decline into unfulfilled visions and penury, possibly one result of the loss of his life’s work in a catastrophic fire.
Cultural transmission
The Hebrew University has discovered an ivory comb from 1700 BCE that is inscribed with a plea to rid oneself of lice. The inscription reads:
“May this [ivory] tusk root out the lice of the hair and the beard.”
Isn’t cultural transmission amazing!
Dangerous images
It passed me by until I saw this:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/20232755/chilling-ai-predicts-god-creepy-images/
With the obvious problem of pornographic imagery as well as issues such as taboo religious iconography, do image GPTs have contraints to limit the content of images they generate? (And if so how do we decide that?)
Didn’t see that coming …
A new job is appearing (you know, one those jobs we don’t yet know exists).
What is this new job?
*drum roll*
A designer of prompts for GPT machines (and whatever might follow them …).
What are the essential aptitudes do you think? Are they general, specific to a particularlar machine or a bit of both?
East is a Big Bird
I watched ‘Moana‘ the other night. Artistically beautiful but debatable cultural politics (for example see here).
I note this because it reminded me about ‘East is a Big Bird’ by Thomas Gladwin that I read ‘back in the day’ (It was published in 1970).
I just picked it up again after the film. A book of its time. It begins with a question that was hot then (in the 1960s): why do schools “…keep penalizing children for the poverty into which they have unwillingly been born…” He investigates this with a ‘study’ of the lives and seafaring expertise of pacific islanders while living among them.
How does this answer the queation … ? … read the book!
It’s a relevant question for educators today. The rise of endemic homelessness (which really began to take off under Thatcher) and widespread food and energy poverty is visible to all yet denied by politicians. Food and warmth – in a rich society such as ours everyone has some right to expect these.
In education, however, we seem to continue on basically the same path as Gladwin had observed (as did many educators at the time). While too many of today’s children endure the misery of poverty, national policy in education has been devoted into ensuring that the ineffective becomes more efficient, i.e. educating kids (and adults) in the same old discriminatory manner. We had hoped that was on the way out at the the end of the 1970s …
How wrong we were … *sobs quietly*
Postscipt: don’t take tis the wrong way. Terrific work is done all day and every day by thousands of teachers fighting the circumstances that constrain both them and their charges are in …
EdTech and Social Control
Sorry the post title is a bit OTT, but it’s direct (until I find a better one)!
- Starting point is Basil Bernstein who said, ,to paraphrase, ‘all society is pedagogical’. Something like that. There used to be a word in common use in the 70s: ‘socialisation’. Not much now.
- It is useful because it implies an active process on integration. It is therefore pedagogical because it involves the transmission of social and cultural mores. However, the word ‘socialisation’ alone does not imply any particular character of the integration. It is simply a process, how we become participants in any kind of community no matter how good … or how bad, as large as a nation, or smaller than a household.
- Socialisation is ongoing, lifelong. It never stops so that over time, for example, values that were once held true can become transgressive.
- There is no clear boundary, nor can there be, between daily life in a community and the place that technology plays in enabling, disrupting, ‘nudging’, or sometimes blocking activities.
- This is a dynamic process for all technologies which can be both a result of earlier social situations as well as a cause of social change.
- Change is usually incremental (or ‘normal’ in a Kuhnian sense) and occasionally revolutionary (‘extraordinary’ in a Kuhnian sense).
- Edtech is intimately woven into the lifelong socialisation of all members of a society
Notes:
Thomas Hillman (@thomhillman) tweeted at 7:05 am on Fri, Apr 01, 2022:
People often ask me how the platformization of education is different from educational technology in general. The big difference is that the center of coordination changes. We’ve moved from technology in classrooms to classrooms in technology. #edtech (https://twitter.com/thomhillman/status/1509773871901196289?t=dAIoKvfwLYYkQP_dCAEhXQ&s=03)
And down we go …
Interesting article: automated writing (GPT3 &c.) will overwhelm WWW even further with dodgy/irrelevant/redundant content as content mills have done already. Worse is to come not only in quantity but in quality too bec the machines that churn it out are being ‘trained’ on the same rubbish they are creating … a rabbit hole?
2030: Education Technology: to the future?
David Longman
January 2020
“The future is already here — it’s just not very evenly distributed.” (Attributed to William Gibson)
The turn of a decade is a convenient calendar moment in which to consider what is to come, to look ahead to consider how educational technology (edtech) might develop during the coming decade.
Here are some possible questions for discussion:
- How will edtech develop during the coming 10-15 years?
- How will the provision and ‘delivery’ of education change (if at all)?
- Perhaps, most importantly, how can we influence the direction of edtech as the future unfolds?
Three recent and interesting papers about possible futures of edtech are listed below illustrating three different futures – each is possible, some are already emerging. (These articles are what Neil Selwyn and his colleagues describe as “social science fiction“.)
Two of the three articles (1 & 3) are open access and article 2 has been contributed by the authors.
To lighten the reading load a bit synopses of the articles have been provided. These are are reasonably accurate summaries of the main content while offering a lighter/quicker read (feedback welcome). Links to the origina papers are given and each paper is Open Access.
[Note added February 2025: The synopses for these papers were created without the use of an AI tool! }
- Paper: What’s next for Ed-Tech? Critical hopes and concerns for the 2020s.(Nov 2019a). Neil Selwyn et al (OA – click the PDF/EPub button for file)
- Paper: What might the school of 2030 be like? An exercise in social science fiction. (Nov 2019b) Neil Selwyn et al (OA – author copy)
- Paper: Students and society in the 2020s. Three future ‘histories’ of education and technology (July 2019) MacGilcrhist et al (OA – click button for file)